Basic Politics
-
This
is what is called a “Normal Curve”.
Most
people are a little surprised when they find out that almost anything
and everything can be represented on a normal curve, but then they
realize its pretty much how reality works. There are exceptions to
every rule, including this one. Using my past experience and looking
at the curve, I would say it’s very likely that the exception
probably occur 2.3% to 4.6% of the time.
With
the “Politics” curve I slapped together, nearly everyone who
looks at it will say “Yes, that's about right”. About 68.2%
probably. About 27.2% will say “I don’t think so, but, eh, close
enough” and 4.6% will probably say “That's wrong”.
There
is another sort-of rule that goes along with it, and I call that
similarity of thought.
Let’s
take a basic political topic, like “Women's Rights”, “Gun
Control”, “taxation”. In order to make this a little easier to
digest, I’m going to call it “Generic Topic”. At the center you
have the vast majority of your people, 68.2% who don’t think the
topic is all that important. The 34.2% that are left of center are
generally supportive. The 34.2% that are right of center are
generally non-supportive.
Going
left, you have the next grouping, the 13.6% who know Generic Topic is
very important, and possibly the most important political topic. This
is the group where you would normally find the loud voices, the
campaigners, the petition takers, the ones with the picket signs.
Going
right, you have the 13.6% who know that Generic Topic is bad and
possibly dangerous. Once again, you’ll find loud voices against
General Topic, people protesting against it, etc.
and
Then… The fringe. The 2 groups of 2.3% that most problems come
from. On the left, you have the faithful, the super fans of General
Topic. It’s the greatest thing and they’ll do whatever it takes
to support it. it’s for the greater good!
On
the Right, the ones who can see that General Topic is their enemy. It
MUST be stopped, whatever it takes! it’s for the greater good!
This
kinda makes sense, right? You see where it’s coming from? Well,
here comes the hard part.
I’ll
try to find a safe topic. I am sure I’ll fail, but I will try.
I’m
going to try “vaping”.
So,
from left to right, you have “Vaping is inherently evil, people who
do it or support it are my personal enemies, it must be stopped”. A
member of this group might sneak into a Vape juice production
facility and pour Vitamin E oil into the vats, so that the people can
more easily see how bad it is! I’ll call this Vape---.
Next, “Vaping is obviously
bad, I don’t like it, I’m going to do what I can to make it go
away”. A member of this group would write letters to their
representatives, post a lot of negative information on Social Media,
start petitions to have it illegalized or at least banned from the
places they go. If they see someone vaping anywhere near them,
they’ll let them know how much they don’t like it. This is
Vape--.
Now,
the middle. The 34.2% who don’t actually care, really, but they
generally don’t like it. They would probably sign a petition
against vaping, if they have the time. But not if they are a smoker
or are in a relationship with one. They might have tried it, and not
liked it. Vape-
and
on the right, The 34.2% who don’t actually care, really, but they
generally like it. They would sign a petition to support vaping, if
they have the time. Have probably tried it, or thought about it.
Vape+
then,
the 13.6% who know how great it is. Not only is it fun, it saves
lives! A member of this group would write letters to their
representatives, post a lot of positive information on Social Media,
start petitions to have Bans revoked. They give vape gifts on
holidays. Vape++
And
then… When someone gets around to forming the Vaping religion, they
will join. Vaping is love, Vaping is life. If they find out the home
address of the main senator leading the legislation against vaping,
he’d better hope he has good security… Vape+++.
OK.
now the apparently difficult part.
Take
any of these groups, it doesn’t matter which, and they will have
empathy only for the adjacent groups. The farther away from their
group a group is, the less they will understand it.
Vape--.
“well, I can see where the guys in Vape--- are coming from, though
they are a little extreme. And the guys in Vape-, well, OK, I think
they just haven’t really thought about it as much as I have”.
“The
guys in Vape+? They are obviously idiots. Vape++ is just crazy, or
there is something else going on there, no one could actually believe
that bullshit. Vape+++? That’s a myth, isn’t it?”
Lets
try Vape+. “The Vape++ group? Yes, I can mostly see their point of
view, I just don’t have the time and money to devote to it.
Besides, I heard one of them giving Vape- a hard time, and, what?
They don’t like Vaping, they can like or dislike what they want.
Vape+++? Those guys are nuts, but I don’t really believe what I’ve
read about how “dangerous” they are. I think they must have
different juice than any I tried, there almost as bad as the
fruitcakes in Vape--”.”Vape-- Fine, you don’t like Vaping,
don’t Vape! Don't try to make ME stop Vaping just because you don’t
like it!, thank god they are all weak-lunged pathetic morons”.
“Vape--- well, I cant really believe anyone would think that way,
but if its true, they need professional help, or possibly
extermination”.
And
it works for pretty much ANY topic! But people have a problem with
it.
What
THEY think is normal or very near-normal, regardless of where they
fit on a topic. If you are Gun Control-, you’ll be able to
empathize with Gun Control-- and Gun Control+, you won’t really be
able to agree with Gun Control---, really, really be unable to find
common ground with Gun Control++, and find Gun Control+++ dangerously
insane.
If
you are Abortion++, you’ll be able to understand Abortion +++ and
Abortion+ point of view, though you don’t share it. The Abortion-
people just don’t get it, they are defective in some way, the
Abortion – are nearly totally wrong, and must have other, secret
reasons they are so screwed up. Abortion --- are pure, blatant
terrorists.
So.
why did I write this? it’s a self-diagnosis tool, partially. On any
given topic, the higher the percentage of the population you can
understand the point of view is, the less + or – marks you have on
that topic. If you really, truly dislike something, look around. Look
around in places you don’t normally go. Do other people dislike it
less than you do, and you can’t find many, or maybe any people who
dislike it more? You might be an extremist. I’m not saying you are
WRONG, by the way. Just that you appear to have an extreme point of
view, and maybe you need to think about that, and why you think that
way.
It’s
also a very long winded way to get the next little bit across in a
way that can be understood.
If
34.2%, +/- 10% of the overall population voted for a candidate for
political office, they are not crazy, Or defective, Or Evil, to have
done so. They might be WRONG, but they aren’t sub-human, even if
you disagree with them. Sorry.
But,
as I said, it’s almost impossible for individuals who have extreme
points of view to realize that they do. And the other little problem,
which is that there are Evil, Crazy, basically defective human beings
out there.
The
final question: How do you tell the difference between someone who is
genuinely Evil, or Crazy, or basically defective from someone who
holds a non-adjacent point of view?
Let
me know when you figure it out. The only thing I can think to do is
to assume they aren’t Evil, until proven (and NOT in the court of
public opinion or social media, real actual proof) Guilty.